She told HomeLight, \u201cI voted no because the plan put forward was a housing plan, not a reparations plan. A real reparations plan would have given autonomy, in the form of cash payments, to those who have been harmed by systemic racism. A real reparations program would have trusted the Black community. This program is an insult to the intent of reparations. It is power dictating to the people rather than the other way around.\u201d<\/p>\n
And it troubles her that Evanston\u2019s plan may serve as a template for other municipalities around the country to follow suit. Instead, other places \u201ccan learn what not to do\u201d from Evanston, she told HomeLight. \u201cThey can create reparations programs that give real agency and autonomy to Black residents who have endured generations of racist government policies that were designed to deny them fair housing, fair wages, decent healthcare, and a good education.\u201d<\/p>\n
Some Evanston residents agree with the alderwoman about the plan, which doesn\u2019t benefit Black community members who don\u2019t own a home or plan to buy one. One such longtime city resident, Rose Cannon, voiced this sentiment during a public comment session<\/a>. \u201cWe want cash payments,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n Original story continues below…<\/em><\/p>\n The systemic racism in real estate<\/a> is well-documented \u2014 and its effects on people of color are real. This is especially true for Black people, who own a disproportionately low share of the homes in the U.S: For instance, consider that there\u2019s a gap of nearly 30% between white and Black homeownership<\/a> in America.<\/p>\n But what if there was something that could actually help reverse decades of damage? And what if that thing was … cannabis<\/i>?<\/p>\n Those are questions that Evanston, Illinois, wants to answer with a revolutionary new program designed to use tax dollars generated from cannabis sales to help increase Black homeownership<\/a> in the suburb. To be clear: Evanston is paying reparations, and pot is helping make it happen.<\/p>\n Here\u2019s an introduction to Evanston\u2019s ground-breaking reparations plan, and how it\u2019s been working so far in the city where white homeownership is disproportionately high and the Black population has been diminishing.<\/p>\n Diversity in Evanston has long been recognized as a problem. The college town of about 74,000 residents, located 12 miles north of Chicago, is mostly white \u2014\u00a0and in the highest-home-value neighborhoods, it\u2019s almost entirely<\/i> white.<\/p>\n And the gap has only been growing in recent years: From 2000 to 2017, the Black population in Evanston decreased from 22.5% to 16.9% of the total population.<\/p>\n Locally, politicians and activists in Evanston had already recognized the issue and had been working on ideas for how to solve it.<\/p>\n \u201cOur gaps were widening,\u201d city alderman Robin Rue Simmons<\/a> explained in an interview with The Guardian<\/i><\/a>.<\/p>\n \u201cI thought we were being delusional to continue in the same vein and believe we would bridge the gap.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Now let\u2019s step back and widen the frame for a moment. This is a nationwide problem \u2014 not limited just to Evanston. And the case for reparations has been gaining steam in recent years as part of scientific research, as well as in the larger cultural conversation.<\/p>\n In 2007, two Oregon State University professors published a study, \u201cHousing Discrimination as a Basis for Black Reparations.\u201d In it, they argued that historic housing and lending discrimination makes for a sound basis to consider Black reparations.<\/p>\n \u201cBecause of a number of policies and practices, particularly those of the federal government, many African Americans were unable to take advantage of the opportunity to buy a home on the favorable terms that were available to many white Americans,\u201d the study noted.<\/p>\n Even when Black Americans could buy homes, these homes were less valuable and appreciated at lower rates, largely due to the same discriminatory policies and practices. All of this resulted in serious structural inequality in housing and the large wealth gap between Black and white households, and it in turn only further reinforced other aspects of racial inequality like access to schools.<\/p>\n Importantly, the study noted, the housing market won\u2019t correct itself for this problem naturally over time. Therefore, the authors wrote, \u201cRegardless of the specific measures that are taken, the essential point should be clear: Black reparations are called for, not just because of slavery but because of much more recent and very systematic injustices. Housing discrimination in the twentieth century forms an important part \u2014 though still only a part \u2014 of the case for Black reparations.\u201d<\/p>\n Back to local politics in Evanston. In June 2019, the city council passed a resolution, 58-R-19<\/a>, \u201caffirming the city\u2019s commitment to end structural racism and achieve racial equity.\u201d<\/p>\n Next, a city equity and empowerment commission held community meetings to talk about reparations and gather input from the public. The commission summarized its findings from these meetings in a report for the city council, which created a subcommittee to start the planning.<\/p>\n By November of that year, the measure came to a vote at a meeting of the Evanston city council. While these types of meetings are often ho-hum affairs covering dry policy topics, this one came with a sense of history and pioneerism \u2014\u00a0and the measure passed nearly unanimously.<\/p>\n The vote was eight to one in favor of \u201cA Resolution Establishing a City of Evanston Funding Source Devoted to Local Reparations.\u201d In so voting, Evanston became the first municipality in the country to pledge public money\u2009to reparations for Black residents.<\/p>\n The language specified how it would happen: \u201cThe Chief Financial Officer is hereby authorized to divert all adult use cannabis funds received by the Illinois Department of Revenue for sales of adult use cannabis to a separate fund in a City account for local reparations.\u201d<\/p>\n As part of the city\u2019s 2020 budget, Evanston created a reparations fund that would draw tax revenue from adult recreational cannabis sales \u2014\u00a0up to $10 million<\/a>. Members of the public are also invited to make a donation<\/a> into the fund.<\/p>\n In February 2020, the reparations subcommittee met to discuss the history and possible solutions to housing and redlining in Evanston. Minutes show the meeting presented stark data on the state of housing in Black America<\/a>.<\/p>\n For instance, Blacks have a 31.14% denial rate for mortgages; this population represents 14.6% of the U.S., but only receives 6% of new mortgages nationwide. In Chicago, of 13,190 Black applications for homeownership, only 5,200 were approved.<\/p>\n By the way, Black access to real estate is not only limited in terms of homeownership, but also in terms of professional access within the industry: According to research by Deloitte<\/a>, fewer than 6% of active real estate agents and brokers identify as Black, compared with more than 11% of the population.<\/p>\n To address this, HomeLight recently announced a partnership with the National Association of Real Estate Brokers<\/a> (NAREB) to launch the Black Real Estate Agent Program<\/a>, an effort geared at making the industry more inclusive while helping Black real estate agents get started \u2014 and thrive \u2014 in the business.<\/p>\n At the February 2020 meeting, Mark Edward Alston, owner of Skyway Realty and Alston & Associates Mortgage Company, and a public policy strategist in the areas of housing and finance, outlined suggestions for needed remedies. Among them, he suggested the reparations fund starts a grant<\/a> of $10,000 to $15,000 for homeowners and homebuyers in Evanston, particularly in its 5th ward. They should receive down payment assistance in the form of a grant, he said.<\/p>\n Months later, in August 2020, a subcommittee appointed by the city council recommended that the council approve the use of $400,000 from the fund for housing assistance programs<\/a> meant to benefit 16 households. The money would provide housing assistance for Black residents who were discriminated against by the city, or whose ancestors were discriminated against by the city in the years between 1900 and 1969.<\/p>\n At a meeting in November, Alderman Ann Rainey explained that the city expects to collect $1 million in the fund within its first year, both through cannabis sales as well as personal donations.<\/p>\n She also said the city plans to develop a committee to review eligibility and determine funding. So these are important steps forward, the city council agrees \u2014\u00a0but there\u2019s plenty of work to be done.<\/p>\n![\"An](\"https:\/\/www.homelight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/Evanston-reparations-university-666x381.png\")
<\/a>Evanston\u2019s diversity problem<\/h2>\n
Bigger-picture housing inequality and the case for reparations<\/h2>\n
![\"An](\"https:\/\/www.homelight.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/02\/Evanston-reparations-home-666x381.png\")
<\/a>Evanston\u2019s ground-breaking solution<\/h2>\n
Rolling out the reparations program<\/h2>\n
What now?<\/h2>\n